Skip Maine state header navigation

Agencies | Online Services | Help

Skip All Navigation

Home > Explore! > Bedrock Geology> 1885 Hitchcock Map

Historical Bedrock Maps of Maine
Part I: The Hitchcock (1885) Map

Introduction

Since William Smith presented the first modern geologic map in 1815, of England and Wales with part of Scotland, geologic maps have become the standard way of portraying geologic information. There have been four significant maps showing Maine's bedrock geology, published in 1885, 1933, 1967, and 1985. Each map is a product of its time, reflecting the current status of knowledge and understanding of geologic principles by the author. So it is best to view each one as a progress report, representing an interpretation of myriad bits of information.

In using a geologic map, or any map for that matter, it is important for the reader to appreciate the purpose for which the map was made. Certain things are shown and many things are not shown. Coloration and labeling emphasize things of perceived importance. In preparing a geologic map, hundreds of decisions are made by the geologist, and scrutiny of the finished map gives insight into that thought process.

In other fact sheets we look at Arthur Keith's 1933 map, the 1967 Preliminary Geologic Map of Maine and the 1985 Bedrock Geologic Map of Maine. This fact sheet presents the 1885 Maine bedrock map. In each case we review the context in which the map was made (History), point out the way in which different rocks are portrayed (Lithology), discuss the geologic ages assigned to the various rocks of Maine (Age), and look at major geological relationships that can be deduced from reading the map (Regional Relationships). Selected close-up areas from the map are presented as figures to illustrate these points.


geological map of Maine 1885 Geological Map of Maine
1885
by
Charles H. Hitchcock
Images of the map:
Medium (814 kb, gif)     Large (2.9 Mb, pdf format)
Map legend and title (257 kb, gif)

Images of the explanatory text:
Medium-sized filesatlas title page (1 Mb, gif)
Page 1 (774 kb, gif)
Page 2 (987 kb, gif)
Page 3 (957 kb, gif)
Page 4 (257 kb, gif)
Large-sized filesFull text (7.7 Mb, pdf format)

History

Results of the Maine Scientific Survey of 1861 and 1862 were described in two lengthy reports and embodied in a large Geological Map of Maine presented by C. H. Hitchcock to the State Legislature. The map was exhibited by special permission to the American Association for the Advancement of Science in about 1868 and an abstract of the explanation was published in the AAAS proceedings. Unfortunately, the whereabouts of the original map is not known. Hitchcock produced a smaller, page-sized map that was published in 1885 as part of Colby's Atlas of the State of Maine. It is based largely on his original 1868 map, though his accompanying text indicates some amount of modification. The Colby Atlas was widely circulated in several printings. Each map was colored by hand. This is one of the finer copies that has survived.

Hitchcock considered this to be a preliminary geologic map. In 1861 he wrote that his original map did not warrant publication since it was so imperfect, but he presented a manuscript copy so that "the total results of all previous explorations will not be lost." Considering the complexity of Maine's bedrock geology and the brief time of study available the 1885 map is remarkable, a testament to Hitchcock's knowledge of geologic principles and his skill at synthesizing an insufficient amount of data into a reasonable interpretation.

geographic index
Geographic Index to the Figures.

Lithology (rock description)

The broad aspects of Maine's bedrock geology are essentially correct. The Silurian and Devonian formations of northern Maine are shown to occupy continuous, northeast-trending tracts (Figure H1). Calcareous slates, indicated as "Upper Silurian", are mapped from Houlton to Fort Fairfield (Figure H1). The complex metamorphic and migmatitic rocks of western and southwestern Maine are set apart, as are the metamorphic rocks extending from Harpswell through Waldo County, although the names "Montalban" and "Laurentian" mean little to modern geologists (Figure H2). The broad lowland area of the central Maine slate belt is delineated, with a patch of Silurian "clay slate" around the controversial Waterville fossils (Figure H3). Large areas of granite had been discovered in Hancock and Washington Counties, at Katahdin, and to the south of Sebago Lake (Figure H4), even though scholars of the day did not agree as to how such masses of granite had formed.

major tracts of Silurian and Devonian rock in northern Maine follow northeasterly trends
Figure H1
metamorphic rocks in southern Maine
Figure H2
slate belt of central Maine
Figure H3
granite bodies in Hancock and Washington Counties, on Mount Katahdin, and south of Sebago Lake
Figure H4
well known areas with patterns similar to modern maps
Figure H5
poorly known areas in northern Hancock County and northern Maine
Figure H6

Where more detailed mapping had been done, mainly in the populated regions, comparison with subsequent bedrock maps shows the enduring quality of the work. Notice, for example, the Upper Devonian red beds near Eastport (Figure H5A), the accurate contacts of the Lucerne, Deblois, and Sedgwick granites near Blue Hill (Figure H5B), the Androscoggin Lake pluton west of Augusta (Figure H5C), and the oval outlier of "Upper Devonian" sandstone west of Presque Isle (Figure H5D). By contrast, the geology of the "Wild Lands" of northern Maine was known only in reconnaissance from bateau and canoe expeditions up the major rivers. It is obvious from the blank area in northern Hancock County, and the sweeping shapes of the contacts in northern Franklin and Somerset Counties that the geology was poorly known in those areas (Figure H6).

Age

By 1861, paleontologists had correctly established the ages of the Upper Devonian Old Red Sandstone at Perry, certain Lower Devonian sandstones and Upper Silurian rocks of northern Maine, and fossil-rich Upper Silurian rocks at Pembroke. Incomplete or problematic fossil collections from Flint Island in Narraguagus Bay and from Waterville suggested Lower Silurian ages for those places also.

Despite the circumstance that "fossils are wanting" elsewhere, Hitchcock assigned most of the remaining rocks to the Lower Paleozoic, relying on the principles of stratigraphic continuity and superposition combined with a knowledge of western New England geology to deduce the ages of Azoic rocks from the ages of fossiliferous ones. A significant conclusion presented on this map is that all of the bedrock in Maine is older than Carboniferous. Therefore, the Carboniferous coal measures being mined at the time in Massachusetts and in New Brunswick do not occur in Maine. "We did not desire to arrive at this conclusion, but the inference must be drawn." (Hitchcock, 1861, p. 255)

Metamorphic rocks of southwest Maine are shown as Montalban and Laurentian (Precambrian), even though Hitchcock allows that "It is difficult as yet to say whether any of these Azoic rocks belong to the Laurentian series or the Paleozoic system." No Ordovician rocks are shown because it was not yet an accepted geologic time period. Rocks we would now call Ordovician were included in the Lower Silurian of Hitchcock's time.

Regional Relationships

Belts of rock of the same age are repeated across the map, especially in northern Maine, due to large anticlinal and synclinal folds (Figure H7). The overlapping pattern of units on the map indicates major unconformities beneath the Middle Devonian, beneath the Upper Silurian, and beneath the Lower Silurian (Figure H7). Relationships among Huronian rocks, Laurentian rocks, and granites are ambiguous.

important regional relationships due to anticlines, synclines, or unconformities
Figure H7

Conclusions

Differences between the various bedrock maps of Maine derive partly from the amount of information available at the time of publication, but depend more importantly on the perspective of the author. Charles Hitchcock was one of the preeminent geologic scholars of his day, with a vast knowledge of New England geology. His 1885 map is clearly an attempt to generalize the major geologic features of Maine into a stratigraphic or historical perspective.  In his explanatory text, Hitchcock mentions many geologic details that demonstrate his command of the facts. But this map is not intended to show all those details. Rather, it gives a larger view of the systematic nature of Maine's geology, related to the geology of  neighboring areas and explained by the workings of geologic processes through time.

References

Hitchcock, Charles H., 1861a, General report upon the geology of Maine: in Preliminary report on natural history and geology: Maine Board of Agriculture, 6th Annual Report, p. 146-328.

Hitchcock, Charles H., 1861b, Geology of the wild lands: in Preliminary report on natural history and geology: Maine Board of Agriculture, 6th Annual Report, p. 377-419, map.

Hitchcock, Charles H., 1862, Geology of Maine [includes contributions by G. L. Goodale, O. White, and E. Holmes]: Maine Board of Agriculture, 7th Annual Report, p. 223-430, map.

Hitchcock, Charles H., 1868, Explanation of a geological map of Maine: American Association for the Advancement of Science, Proceedings, vol. 16, p. 123.

Hitchcock, Charles H., 1885, Geology: in Colby's Atlas of the State of Maine: George N. Colby & Co., Houlton, Maine, p. 14-17.

Hitchcock, Charles H., 1885, Geological map of Maine: in Colby's Atlas of the State of Maine: George N. Colby & Co., Houlton, Maine, p. 27 (scale approximately 1:1,267,200).


Text by Henry N. Berry IV

Graphics by Marc Loiselle and Henry Berry

Originally published on the web as the June 2004 Site of the Month.


Last updated on April 11, 2012